Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40365022›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2025

The Art (and Science) of Individualized Selection of Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS).

Vicky Hsieh, David M Sherer, Kateryna Davydovych, Mila Kheyman, Mudar Dalloul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vicky HsiehThe Division of Medical Genetics, The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of New York (SUNY), Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
David M ShererThe Division of Medical Genetics, The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of New York (SUNY), Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1764-8797
Kateryna DavydovychThe Division of Medical Genetics, The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of New York (SUNY), Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Mila KheymanThe Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of New York (SUNY), Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Mudar DalloulThe Division of Medical Genetics, The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of New York (SUNY), Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3538-086X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS), utilizing cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA), has revolutionized prenatal care, transitioning from primarily detecting common fetal aneuploidies to encompassing detection of an increasingly broader spectrum of autosomal dominant and recessive conditions. This Commentary delves into the evolution of NIPS, emphasizes the importance of individualized selection of NIPS strategies based on specific clinical scenarios including patient characteristics, and explores its applications beyond aneuploidy screening. The optimal NIPS strategy should be carefully selected based on individual patient factors, including the specific clinical indications, maternal characteristics such as BMI, medical history, medication use, history of previous pregnancies, fetal characteristics such as multiple gestation or suspected anomalies, and the available NIPS technologies. There are also considerations in choosing between MPSS and SNP-based NIPS based cfDNA screening technologies. NIPS is a screening test; hence, diagnostic testing remains crucial for confirmation of any abnormal screening results. Notwithstanding, NIPS has significantly transformed prenatal care, offering valuable insights into fetal health and enabling earlier identification of potential risks. By carefully considering individual patient factors and selecting the most appropriate NIPS strategy, clinicians have the ability to maximize the benefits of this innovative technology while minimizing potential limitations. Continued research and technological advancements will further refine NIPS and expand its applications in the future.

Indexed as

cell-free fetal DNAfetal aneuploidynoninvasive prenatal screeningprenatal care

Identifiers

PMID40365022
PMCPMC12070074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.