ArticleInternational journal of women's health2025
The Art (and Science) of Individualized Selection of Non-Invasive Prenatal Screening (NIPS).
Article in International journal of women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A fetus with paternal uniparental isodisomy of chromosome 3: genetic analysis and prenatal diagnosis following a positive NIPS with IUGR.Molecular cytogenetics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS), utilizing cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA), has revolutionized prenatal care, transitioning from primarily detecting common fetal aneuploidies to encompassing detection of an increasingly broader spectrum of autosomal dominant and recessive conditions. This Commentary delves into the evolution of NIPS, emphasizes the importance of individualized selection of NIPS strategies based on specific clinical scenarios including patient characteristics, and explores its applications beyond aneuploidy screening. The optimal NIPS strategy should be carefully selected based on individual patient factors, including the specific clinical indications, maternal characteristics such as BMI, medical history, medication use, history of previous pregnancies, fetal characteristics such as multiple gestation or suspected anomalies, and the available NIPS technologies. There are also considerations in choosing between MPSS and SNP-based NIPS based cfDNA screening technologies. NIPS is a screening test; hence, diagnostic testing remains crucial for confirmation of any abnormal screening results. Notwithstanding, NIPS has significantly transformed prenatal care, offering valuable insights into fetal health and enabling earlier identification of potential risks. By carefully considering individual patient factors and selecting the most appropriate NIPS strategy, clinicians have the ability to maximize the benefits of this innovative technology while minimizing potential limitations. Continued research and technological advancements will further refine NIPS and expand its applications in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.