Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40365018›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2025

Mitochondria-derived reactive oxygen species induce over-differentiation of neural stem/progenitor cells after non-cytotoxic cisplatin exposure.

Felipe A Bustamante-Barrientos, Eliana Lara-Barba, Yeimi Herrera-Luna, Cynthia García-Guerrero, Eduardo Silva-Pavez, Jonathan Morales-Reyes, María Jesús Araya, Liliana Yanten-Fuentes, Noymar Luque-Campos, Claudia Altamirano and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Felipe A Bustamante-BarrientosLaboratorio de Inmunología Celular y Molecular, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.
Eliana Lara-BarbaLaboratorio de Inmunología Celular y Molecular, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.
Yeimi Herrera-LunaLaboratorio de Inmunología Celular y Molecular, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.
Cynthia García-GuerreroLaboratorio de Inmunología Celular y Molecular, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.
Eduardo Silva-PavezFacultad de Odontología y Ciencias de la Rehabilitación, Universidad San Sebastián, Santiago, Chile.
Jonathan Morales-ReyesLaboratorio de Inmunología Celular y Molecular, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.
María Jesús ArayaLaboratorio de Inmunología Celular y Molecular, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.
Liliana Yanten-FuentesLaboratorio de Inmunología Celular y Molecular, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.
Noymar Luque-CamposLaboratorio de Inmunología Celular y Molecular, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.
Claudia AltamiranoIMPACT, Center of Interventional Medicine for Precision and Advanced Cellular Therapy, Santiago, Chile.
Ana María Vega-LetterEscuela de Ingeniería Bioquímica, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.
Patricia Luz-CrawfordLaboratorio de Inmunología Celular y Molecular, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de los Andes, Santiago, Chile.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Neural stem and progenitor cells (NSPCs) are crucial for nervous system development and self-renewal. However, their properties are sensitive to environmental and chemical factors, including chemotherapy agents like cisplatin, an FDA-approved drug used to treat cancer. Cisplatin inhibits DNA replication but can cause side effects such as nephrotoxicity, ototoxicity, and neurotoxicity. While its cytotoxic effects are well understood, the impact of non-cytotoxic cisplatin concentrations on NSPC differentiation remains unclear. Methods: This study examined how non-cytotoxic cisplatin exposure influences NSPC differentiation and mitochondrial activity, specifically through reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation. Mitochondrial activity was analyzed via tetrazolium salt (MTT) assay, ATP biosynthesis, mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm), biomass, and ROS production. Glycolytic activity was assessed by extracellular acidification and lactate production. Self-renewal capacity and differentiation were measured using flow cytometry and confocal microscopy. Mitochondrial ROS generation was modulated with Mito-TEMPO. Results: After 24 h of non-cytotoxic cisplatin exposure (5 μM), mitochondrial activity increased, as shown by higher MTT conversion, ATP content, ΔΨm, biomass, and ROS levels. Despite a stabilization of mitochondrial activity and ROS production by 72 h, this exposure impaired cell cycle progression, self-renewal, and enhanced differentiation toward neuronal and glial lineages. Inhibition of mitochondrial ROS production reduced neuronal and glial differentiation but did not restore self-renewal or cell cycle progression. A decrease in extracellular acidification and lactate production indicated a shift from glycolysis to mitochondrial respiration. Discussion: Even at subtherapeutic levels, cisplatin disrupts NSPC integrity, driving differentiation through mitochondrial ROS-dependent mechanisms. While inhibiting ROS reduced differentiation, it did not restore NSPC proliferation. These findings highlight the vulnerability of NSPCs to cisplatin, even at doses considered safe. The metabolic shift toward mitochondrial respiration may contribute to this differentiation bias. Future research on co-administration of antioxidant agents during chemotherapy could protect NSPC integrity and mitigate developmental and cognitive risks, especially in neonates exposed via breastfeeding.

Indexed as

cysplatinmitochondrial ROSneural stem progenitor cellsneurogenesisoxidative stressstem cell differentiation

Identifiers

PMID40365018
PMCPMC12069383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.