Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40365007›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025

Exploring the experience of informal caregivers of dependent elderly people with the well-being valuation method.

Tongzhou Lyu, Suwei Yuan, Yanping Xu, Wenwei Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tongzhou LyuSchool of Politics and International Relations, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Suwei YuanOffice of the Director, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yanping XuSchool of Social and Public Administration, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
Wenwei LiuCollege of Philosophy, Law and Political Science, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Although informal caregivers are the primary providers of long-term care for the elderly globally, research on the impact of caregiving experiences on the well-being of caregivers is relatively limited. Methods: This study conducted interviews with 297 family informal caregivers in Shanghai, measured their subjective burdens, and applied the well-being valuation method to calculate the monetary value of the welfare changes resulting from caregiving burdens. Results: According to the findings, sub-dimensions of the Chinese version of the Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA) of disrupted schedule, lack of family support, and self-esteem were significantly related to caregivers' well-being. For caregivers with average income and average CRA scores, the impact of caregiving experiences on their well-being level was equivalent to a monthly income reduction of 226.69 RMB (4.7% of their monthly income). Discussion: This paper provides a new and useful perspective for the evaluation of long-term care policies, and suggests prioritizing the alleviation of caregivers' schedule and social relationship burdens, and understanding the 'intrinsic coping mechanisms' of caregiving responses from an economic perspective.

Indexed as

informal careinformal caregiver burdeninformal caregiverssubjective well-beingwell-being valuation method

Identifiers

PMID40365007
PMCPMC12069315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.