ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
At-risk youth receive similar benefits from equine- assisted psychotherapy and traditional psychotherapy; an applied analysis.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Perceived Benefits and Barriers for Autistic Adults Accessing Therapeutic Horse Riding for Mental Health.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Equine-assisted psychotherapy (EAP) is a promising modality for the treatment of emotional difficulties in youth. Few studies have compared the benefits of EAP to those of traditional psychotherapy for at-risk youth in community-based settings. Method: We compare the effectiveness of individually administered EAP and traditional psychotherapy (TP) for improving adolescent mental health using data from a community-based participatory research partnership. Adolescent clients who were referred to a community-based non-profit agency for services related to emotional and behavioral difficulties comprised the sample (N = 94, mean age at intake was 14.33 years). We compared the improvement in mental health outcomes between intake and follow-up for participants who received weekly, individual TP (N = 65) with those who received weekly, individual EAGALA-certified EAP (N = 29). Licensed mental health professionals administered treatments (mean treatment period of 241 days). Results: On average, clients' global psychological, social, and emotional wellness scores on the Mental Health Continuum improved by 18-23%. Clients' resilience, self-efficacy, social and emotional skills, perceptions of hope, and cognitive reappraisal skills also improved significantly (12% to 28%) with one exception; average emotion suppression scores did not change across the treatment period in either group ( Discussion: These quasi-experimental data confirm that community-based non-profit programs that offer psychotherapy benefit at-risk youth and indicate that EAP and TP may provide similar benefits to struggling youth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.