SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Problematic trading: a Systematic Review of theoretical considerations.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Online Personalized Normative Feedback to Foster Intention to Change and Help Seeking in Young Adults With Disordered Gambling and Trading Behaviors: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Problematic cryptoasset trading is associated with greater depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and social isolation.PloS one · 2026Article
- Methodological issues in behavioral addictions' research: A call for an unbiased analysis of excessive behaviors.Addictive behaviors reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aims: Recently, the psychological literature increased attention to problematic financial trading, usually adopting the behavioral addiction framework aprioristically. Therefore, we aim to systematize the theoretical literature across different scholarly areas to detect if there is an accurate theorization and operationalization of the construct that considers the features of problematic trading. Methods: We used six scientific databases (MEDLINE, PsycARTICLES, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science). We found that 23 papers met our eligibility criteria. Results: Our systematic review showed that problematic trading received attention since the '90s in the economy/law area. However, none of the 11 non-psychological papers conceptualized problematic trading as a phenomenon on its own. Regarding instead the psychological literature, ten up to 12 papers used the behavioral addiction framework, usually assimilating problematic trading to gambling. Moreover, only four papers conceptualized it as a distinct diagnosis from gambling. Discussion and conclusions: Even if the psychological literature seems to begin supporting the conceptualization of problematic trading as a disorder on its own, there is a tendency to assimilate it into gambling. We recommend that future studies analyze problematic trading as a distinct phenomenon and avoid the aprioristic use of the gambling framework to unveil the features of this new potential clinical disorder. Thus, qualitative studies for in-depth knowledge of problematic trading would be critical before suggesting a specific operationalization of the construct and a scale of measure. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD4202455828, identifier CRD42024558280.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.