Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40364990›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2025

Applying LFQRatio Normalization in Quantitative Proteomic Analysis of Microbial Co-culture Systems.

Mengxun Shi, Caroline A Evans, Josie L McQuillan, Josselin Noirel, Jagroop Pandhal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mengxun ShiSchool of Chemical, Materials and Biological Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Caroline A EvansSchool of Chemical, Materials and Biological Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Josie L McQuillanSchool of Chemical, Materials and Biological Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Josselin NoirelGBCM Laboratory (EA7528), Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, HESAM Université, 2 rue Conté, Paris, France.
Jagroop PandhalSchool of Chemical, Materials and Biological Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantitative proteomic analysis plays a crucial role in understanding microbial co-culture systems. Traditional techniques, such as label-free quantification (LFQ) and label-based proteomics, provide valuable insights into the interactions and metabolic exchanges of microbial species. However, the complexity of microbial co-culture systems often leads to challenges in data normalization, especially when dealing with comparative LFQ data where ratios of different organisms can vary across experiments. This protocol describes the application of LFQRatio normalization, a novel normalization method designed to improve the reliability and accuracy of quantitative proteomics data obtained from microbial co-cultures. The method was developed following the analysis of factors that affect both the identification of proteins and the quantitative accuracy of co-culture proteomics. These include peptide physicochemical characteristics such as isoelectric point (pI), molecular weight (MW), hydrophobicity, dynamic range, and proteome size, as well as shared peptides between species. We then created a normalization method based on LFQ intensity values named LFQRatio normalization. This approach was demonstrated by analysis of a synthetic co-culture of two bacteria,

Indexed as

Label-free quantificationLFQRatio normalizationMicrobial co-cultureProteomicsQuantitative proteomics

Identifiers

PMID40364990
PMCPMC12067310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.