ArticleBio-protocol2025
Analysis of qRT-PCR Data to Identify the Most Stable Reference Gene Using gQuant.
Article in Bio-protocol, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in algorithms for normalizer gene selection in qRT-PCR: implications for cancer biology and precision medicine.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- Enhanced therapeutic efficacy of silibinin loaded silica coated magnetic nanocomposites against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Combination with Ciprofloxacin and HepG2 cancer cells.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accurate quantification of nucleic acid-based biomarkers, including long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), messenger RNAs (mRNAs), and microRNAs (miRNAs), is essential for disease diagnostics and risk assessment across the biological spectrum. Quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) is the gold standard assay for the quantitative measurement of RNA expression levels, but its reliability depends on selecting stable reference targets for normalization. Yet, the lack of consensus on a universally accepted reference gene for a given sample type or species, despite being necessary for accurate quantification, presents a challenge to the broad application of such biomarkers. Various tools are currently being used to identify a stably expressed gene by using qRT-PCR data of a few potential normalizer genes. However, existing tools for normalizer gene selection are fraught with both statistical limitations and inadequate graphical user interfaces for data visualization. gQuant, the tool presented here, essentially overcomes these limitations. The tool is structured in two key components: the preprocessing component and the data analysis component. The preprocessing addresses missing values in the given dataset by the imputation strategies. After data preprocessing, normalizer genes are ranked using democratic strategies that integrate predictions from multiple statistical methods. The effectiveness of gQuant was validated through data available online as well as in-house data derived from urinary exosomal miRNA expression datasets. Comparative analysis against existing tools demonstrated that gQuant delivers more stable and consistent rankings of normalizer genes. With its promising performance, gQuant enhances the precision and reproducibility in the identification of normalizer genes across diverse research scenarios, addressing key limitations of RNA biomarker-based translational research. Key features • Accurate reference gene selection: gQuant identifies the most stable gene in qRT-PCR datasets using a multi-metric approach including SD, GM, CV, and KDE. • Robust missing data handling: Implements imputation and removal strategies to ensure data integrity and accurate normalizer selection. • Bias-free ranking algorithm: Utilizes a voting-based classifier to provide fair and consistent ranking, overcoming limitations of weighted approaches. • Comprehensive visualization: Offers boxplots and KDE plots for analyzing gene expression variability, aiding in data interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.