ArticleFrontiers in health services2025
Hospital managers' experiences of conducting a root cause analysis: a case study following a sentinel event.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Local anesthetic overdose during nurse-led epidural analgesia due to occlusion alarm misinterpretation: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Enhancing patient care quality and safety under the hospital-wide "One Bed" model: a FMEA-based approach.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Root cause analysis (RCA) is a method used in healthcare to systematically identify and address underlying causes of adverse or sentinel events to enhance patient safety and mitigate risks. This study explores hospital managers' experiences of conducting an RCA process following a sentinel event in which a baby unexpectedly died during labor at a Norwegian hospital in 2021. Method: The study employed a qualitative, exploratory single-case design, which involved conducting nine semi-structured interviews and analyzing documents such as the Norwegian RCA guideline, the final RCA report, and internal procedures and standards. The interviews were conducted between May and August 2021. Thematic analysis was used to organize and interpret the transcribed data. The research addressed the following question: Results: Two main themes emerged. The first theme Conclusion: The findings highlight the need for more precise role definitions, better resources, and stronger emotional support systems to strengthen RCA processes. Although national RCA guidelines provide a valuable framework, real-world constraints and unique circumstances often require adaptive approaches. This study emphasizes managers' pivotal role in bridging the gap between regulatory expectations and organizational realities, underscoring the need for both practical and emotional support to ensure effective RCA implementation in sentinel events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.