Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40364948›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2025

Hospital managers' experiences of conducting a root cause analysis: a case study following a sentinel event.

Silje Liepelt, Ralf Kirchhoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Silje LiepeltDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Ålesund, Norway.
Ralf KirchhoffDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Ålesund, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Root cause analysis (RCA) is a method used in healthcare to systematically identify and address underlying causes of adverse or sentinel events to enhance patient safety and mitigate risks. This study explores hospital managers' experiences of conducting an RCA process following a sentinel event in which a baby unexpectedly died during labor at a Norwegian hospital in 2021. Method: The study employed a qualitative, exploratory single-case design, which involved conducting nine semi-structured interviews and analyzing documents such as the Norwegian RCA guideline, the final RCA report, and internal procedures and standards. The interviews were conducted between May and August 2021. Thematic analysis was used to organize and interpret the transcribed data. The research addressed the following question: Results: Two main themes emerged. The first theme Conclusion: The findings highlight the need for more precise role definitions, better resources, and stronger emotional support systems to strengthen RCA processes. Although national RCA guidelines provide a valuable framework, real-world constraints and unique circumstances often require adaptive approaches. This study emphasizes managers' pivotal role in bridging the gap between regulatory expectations and organizational realities, underscoring the need for both practical and emotional support to ensure effective RCA implementation in sentinel events.

Indexed as

guideline adherenceNorwaypatient safetyqualitative researchroot cause analysis (RCA) methodsentinel event

Identifiers

PMID40364948
PMCPMC12069439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.