Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40364947›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2025

Constructing ancestral recombination graphs through reinforcement learning.

Mélanie Raymond, Marie-Hélène Descary, Cédric Beaulac, Fabrice Larribe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mélanie RaymondDepartment of Mathematics, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Marie-Hélène Descary *Department of Mathematics, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Cédric Beaulac *Department of Mathematics, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.
Fabrice Larribe *Department of Mathematics, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Over the years, many approaches have been proposed to build ancestral recombination graphs (ARGs), graphs used to represent the genetic relationship between individuals. Among these methods, many rely on the assumption that the most likely graph is among those with the fewest recombination events. In this paper, we propose a new approach to build maximum parsimony ARGs: Reinforcement Learning (RL). Methods: We exploit the similarities between finding the shortest path between a set of genetic sequences and their most recent common ancestor and finding the shortest path between the entrance and exit of a maze, a classic RL problem. In the maze problem, the learner, called the agent, must learn the directions to take in order to escape as quickly as possible, whereas in our problem, the agent must learn the actions to take between coalescence, mutation, and recombination in order to reach the most recent common ancestor as quickly as possible. Results: Our results show that RL can be used to build ARGs with as few recombination events as those built with a heuristic algorithm optimized to build minimal ARGs, and sometimes even fewer. Moreover, our method allows to build a distribution of ARGs with few recombination events for a given sample, and can also generalize learning to new samples not used during the learning process. Discussion: RL is a promising and innovative approach to build ARGs. By learning to construct ARGs just from the data, our method differs from conventional methods that rely on heuristic rules or complex theoretical models.

Indexed as

ancestral recombination graphensemble methodgenealogygenetic statisticsneural networkreinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID40364947
PMCPMC12069460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.