ArticleCureus2025
Enhancing Postoperative Virtual Visits in Vascular Surgery: A Quality Improvement Initiative Amidst COVID-19.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn the realm of healthcare, virtual care has emerged as a pivotal tool for patient-provider communication, particularly amid the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. In vascular surgery, the adoption of postoperative virtual visits has proved to be a safe, cost-effective, and efficient means of monitoring patient recovery while minimizing the need for in-person clinic appointments. But despite its potential benefits, the use of virtual postoperative visits remains suboptimal, prompting the creation of a quality improvement initiative aimed at enhancing their use. Background and local problem: Virtual postoperative visits play a crucial role in timely identification of complications such as wound infection, hematoma, or graft failure in vascular surgery patients. Yet even as the pandemic necessitated a shift towards virtual care, the rate of postoperative virtual visits in a cancer center remained steady at around 30%. Recognizing this as a local problem, efforts were directed towards increasing the utilization of virtual postoperative visits through targeted interventions. METHODS AND
interventionsThe quality improvement initiative encompassed several key interventions within the discharge process: a) implementation of scheduled virtual visits post-education and patient discussions pre-discharge; b) modification of the electronic health record to include smart phrases facilitating virtual visit education and built-in reminders for follow-up scheduling; c) adaptation of patient education materials to incorporate real-time demonstrations and keywords for virtual assessments; and d) staff training on virtual evaluation techniques for incisions and postoperative complications.
resultsFollowing the implementation of these interventions and iterative Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles, the rate of postoperative virtual visits surged to over 50% and was sustained. A sample of 49 patients revealed an impressive 87% completion rate for virtual visits within three weeks post-surgery. Additionally, associated benefits included a reduction in clinic no-show rates, 30-day readmission rates, and surgical site infections. Notably, the teach-back method emerged as an effective strategy for educating elderly patients on virtual visit technologies, underscoring the feasibility of virtual postoperative care among this demographic.
conclusionThe successful enhancement of postoperative virtual visits in vascular surgery not only underscores the safety and feasibility of virtual care but also offers avenues for future research. From exploring the impact of nursing care and patient education to ensuring equitable access among older adults, virtual postoperative care stands as a promising frontier in enhancing patient outcomes and optimizing healthcare delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.