Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40364868›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Unlocking Osteoporosis Diagnosis: Unveiling the Potential of MRI-Based Vertebral Bone Quality Score.

Divya Pabbisetti, Anantaram Gudipati, Amber Papalkar, Sandeep Ponnaganti, Harshitha Shanbhag, Akanksha Bhashyakarla, Kiran Kumar Sailagundla, Pujitha Innamuri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Divya PabbisettiDepartment of Radiology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, IND.
Anantaram GudipatiDepartment of Radiology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, IND.
Amber PapalkarDepartment of Radiology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, IND.
Sandeep PonnagantiDepartment of Radiology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, IND.
Harshitha ShanbhagDepartment of Radiology, Bala Gangadharanatha Swamiji (BGS) Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, IND.
Akanksha BhashyakarlaDepartment of Radiology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, IND.
Kiran Kumar SailagundlaDepartment of Radiology, Sacred Heart Hospital, Pensacola, USA.
Pujitha InnamuriDepartment of Radiology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOsteoporosis is the most common skeletal disease in humans. The current gold standard technique to diagnose osteoporosis is the measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). However, DEXA overestimates BMD when there are degenerative changes. Vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score may serve as a supplementary technique.

aimTo explore the value of VBQ score in diagnosing osteoporosis in patients with and without degenerative changes. To formulate a cut-off VBQ score for diagnosing osteoporosis. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective study was conducted using the data of 112 patients who underwent radiographs, MR imaging, and DEXA scans of the lumbar spine in our hospital over a period of one year from July 2023 to 2024. The patients were divided into degenerative and control groups based on radiographic findings. VBQ score was calculated as the ratio of mean signal intensity (SI) of L1 to L4 vertebral bodies and signal intensity (SI) of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at L3 on T1. Demographic data, BMD, and T-score were recorded. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to compare the VBQ score with the BMD and T-score. The VBQ score threshold was obtained and compared with the efficacy of osteoporosis diagnosis based on DEXA.

resultsThe degenerative group was older than the control group (70.1 vs. 59.8, P = 0.001). The VBQ score of the control group suggested a higher correlation with BMD value and T-score (r = -0.506 and -0.520, respectively). The BMD value and T-score in the degenerative group were higher (P < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the VBQ score had good predictability for osteoporosis (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.804), with 71.4% sensitivity and 81.8% specificity in the control group. Based on the T-score, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of osteoporosis between the degenerative and control groups (18.5% vs. 24.1%, P= 0.46); based on the VBQ score, the prevalence in the degenerative group was significantly higher (55.5% vs. 40.9%, P= 0.025).

conclusionMRI-based VBQ score is a simple, easy-to-calculate tool and does not require exposure to ionizing radiation to analyze bone quality. VBQ scores potentially overcome the shortcomings of DEXA for diagnosing osteoporosis, especially in older patients with more degenerative changes, where setting DEXA may give spurious results. VBQ score may be used as a supplementary tool along with DEXA. However, MRI is an expensive investigation, and its utility as a diagnostic tool for osteoporosis in the absence of other indications, such as degenerative disc disease, may not be justified. Further studies with larger sample sizes are required to formulate a VBQ score threshold cut-off value for osteoporosis diagnosis.

Indexed as

bone mineral density (bmd)dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (dexa)osteopeniaosteoporosisvertebral bone quality (vbq) score

Identifiers

PMID40364868
PMCPMC12069670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.