ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
Resting-state functional connectivity changes following audio-tactile speech training.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Can youImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding speech in background noise is a challenging task, especially when the signal is also distorted. In a series of previous studies, we have shown that comprehension can improve if, simultaneously with auditory speech, the person receives speech-extracted low-frequency signals on their fingertips. The effect increases after short audio-tactile speech training. In this study, we used resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) to measure spontaneous low-frequency oscillations in the brain while at rest to assess training-induced changes in functional connectivity. We observed enhanced functional connectivity (FC) within a right-hemisphere cluster corresponding to the middle temporal motion area (MT), the extrastriate body area (EBA), and the lateral occipital cortex (LOC), which, before the training, was found to be more connected to the bilateral dorsal anterior insula. Furthermore, early visual areas demonstrated a switch from increased connectivity with the auditory cortex before training to increased connectivity with a sensory/multisensory association parietal hub, contralateral to the palm receiving vibrotactile inputs, after training. In addition, the right sensorimotor cortex, including finger representations, was more connected internally after the training. The results altogether can be interpreted within two main complementary frameworks. The first, speech-specific, factor relates to the pre-existing brain connectivity for audio-visual speech processing, including early visual, motion, and body regions involved in lip-reading and gesture analysis under difficult acoustic conditions, upon which the new audio-tactile speech network might be built. The other framework refers to spatial/body awareness and audio-tactile integration, both of which are necessary for performing the task, including in the revealed parietal and insular regions. It is possible that an extended training period is necessary to directly strengthen functional connections between the auditory and the sensorimotor brain regions for the utterly novel multisensory task. The results contribute to a better understanding of the largely unknown neuronal mechanisms underlying tactile speech benefits for speech comprehension and may be relevant for rehabilitation in the hearing-impaired population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.