Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40364851›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in digital health2025

Artificial intelligence-based tools for patient support to enhance medication adherence: a focused review.

Zilma Silveira Nogueira Reis, Gláucia Miranda Varella Pereira, Cristiane Dos Santos Dias, Eura Martins Lage, Isaias José Ramos de Oliveira, Adriana Silvina Pagano

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zilma Silveira Nogueira ReisHealth Informatics Center, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Gláucia Miranda Varella PereiraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Cristiane Dos Santos DiasDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Eura Martins LageDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Isaias José Ramos de OliveiraHealth Informatics Center, Faculty of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Adriana Silvina PaganoArts Faculty, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Medication adherence involves patients correctly taking medications as prescribed. This review evaluates whether artificial intelligence (AI) based tools contribute to adherence-related insights or avoid medication intake errors. Methods: We assessed studies employing AI tools to directly benefit patient medication use, promoting adherence or avoiding self-administration error outcomes. The search strategy was conducted on six databases in August 2024. ROB2 and ROBINS1 assessed the risk of bias. Results: The review gathered seven eligible studies, including patients from three clinical trials and one prospective cohort. The overall risk of bias was moderate to high. Three reports drew on conceptual frameworks with simulated testing. The evidence identified was scarce considering measurable outcomes. However, based on randomized clinical trials, AI-based tools improved medication adherence ranging from 6.7% to 32.7% compared to any intervention controls and current practices, respectively. Digital intervention using video and voice interaction providing real-time monitoring pointed to AI's potential to alert to self-medication errors. Based on conceptual framework reports, we highlight the potential of cognitive behavioral approaches tailored to engage patients in their treatment. Conclusion: Even though the present evidence is weak, smart systems using AI tools are promising in helping patients use prescribed medications. The review offers insights for future research. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024571504, identifier: CRD42024571504.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencedirective counselingmachine learningmedication adherenceprescriptions

Identifiers

PMID40364851
PMCPMC12069381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.