ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025
Utility of the neonatal and pediatric sequential organ failure assessment scores in critically ill term neonates.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heterogeneity of Critical Organ Dysfunction During Late-Onset Bacteremia in Preterm Infants.JAMA network open · 2026Observational
- Neonatal Sepsis as Organ Dysfunction: Prognostic Accuracy and Clinical Utility of the nSOFA in the NICU-A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The pediatric sequential organ failure assessment (pSOFA) and neonatal SOFA (nSOFA) scores are used to assess organ dysfunction and predict mortality in critically ill children and neonates. However, their utility in predicting mortality in term neonates admitted to pediatric ICU/pediatric cardiac ICU (PICU/PCICU) and neonatal ICU (NICU) remains unknown. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of electronic health records of 4,403 and 379 term neonates admitted to NICU and PICU/PCICU, respectively. Hourly pSOFA and nSOFA scores were calculated. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. The area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for mortality was calculated. Results: Both scores predicted mortality in both settings (AUROC range, 0.79-0.95). The pSOFA showed a larger difference between survivors and non-survivors in the PICU/PCICU cohort, while nSOFA captured critical mortality risk factors in neonates across both settings. Conclusions: Both pSOFA and nSOFA predicted mortality with good to very good discrimination in critically ill term neonates admitted to PICU/PCICU and NICU settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.