ArticleLasers in surgery and medicine2025
Efficacy of Erbium and CO
Article in Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fractional CO₂ vaginal laser therapy for genitourinary syndrome of menopause in breast cancer survivors: a scoping review.Lasers in medical science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis scoping review aimed to synthesize the existing scientific literature on the methods, tools, and strategies employed in vaginal laser therapy for treating genitourinary syndrome in breast cancer survivors.
methodsA systematic search was conducted in August 2024 across six electronic databases-MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase (Elsevier), Scopus (Elsevier), Cochrane Library (Central), Virtual Health Library (VHL), and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics)-for studies reporting the use of CO
resultsA total of 2372 studies were identified through the electronic databases. After excluding 458 duplicates, 2134 titles and abstracts were screened. Thirty full-text records were assessed for eligibility, of which 10 were excluded for incomplete results and different technologies. Ultimately, 1189 patients out of 20 studies were selected for inclusion in this review: 14 studies used CO
conclusionBoth CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.