ArticleJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2025
Electrical wave generation and spatial organization in uterine tissue.
Article in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multiscale PBPK-PD model of oxytocin-induced uterine excitation and contraction.The Journal of physiology · 2026Article
- Mapping the variability of in vivo rat uterine electrical properties throughout the oestrous cycle.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Objective and comprehensive characterization of uterine peristaltic activity throughout the menstrual cycle by means of intracavitary electrohysterography, a cohort study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Healthy uterine function requires coordinated and spatially organized contractions over the menstrual cycle (oestrus in animals) and at term in pregnancy. The underlying mechanisms triggering and coordinating uterine contractions, without a distinct pacemaking region, are poorly understood. Potentially, gap-junction coupling between excitable smooth muscle cells themselves or between electrically passive cells (telocytes or fibroblasts) and excitable cells may be key. Here, we present a lattice-tissue model of coupled excitable and passive cells to investigate a potential mechanism of coordinated tissue contraction. Bifurcation analysis of cell pairs quantifies parameter windows exhibiting oscillatory behaviour. Within these windows, we demonstrate conditions when the magnitude and spatial distribution of coupling strengths generate electrical waves. Energy-based analysis of excitable cells provides quantification of intercellular energy differences cells required for spontaneous wave generation. Our model suggests passive cells must rest at a membrane voltage sufficiently higher than smooth muscle cells to trigger activity and that coupling between excitable and passive cells in spatially concentrated regions could influence the direction of tissue-wide electrical waves. This suggests that both the total number of gap junctions and their spatial expression may play a role in coordinating uterine contractility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.