ArticlePlant, cell & environment2025
Tree Growth, Contraction and Recovery: Disentangling Soil and Atmospheric Drought Effects.
Article in Plant, cell & environment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wood type influences tree responses to recurring hot and dry summer tree water deficits across European forests.European journal of forest research · 2026Article
- The Sequence of Drought-Driven Stomatal Closure, Stem Xylem Embolism, Dehydration, and Aquaporin Gene Expression Differs Among Species.Physiologia plantarumArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We investigate how soil and atmospheric droughts jointly impact tree growth and recovery dynamics in a semi-arid pine forest, leveraging high-resolution stem diameter variation data and an irrigation experiment. The irrigated plot, where soil drought was mitigated, served as a benchmark to isolate the effects of atmospheric drought and distinguish them from the compound drought conditions experienced by control trees. Using a suite of tools based only on stem diameter variation, we identified growth modes that vary in accordance with soil water availability. Control trees showed negligible growth during the dry season but rapidly recovered with the onset of the wet season, matching the baseline growth rates of the irrigated trees, suggesting minimal compromise in hydraulic functioning. Our main finding is that heatwaves consistently depress stem-expansion rates, regardless of treatment. However, during the dry season, this negative impact diverges sharply between the treatments. Because irrigated trees benefit from a hydraulic buffer supplied by ample soil water and thus retain a positive growth baseline, the depression merely slows their expansion, whereas control trees already near zero are driven into net contraction. These findings offer new understanding of how trees balance growth, contraction, and recovery under varying drought conditions, revealing the pivotal role of soil water in shaping drought responses across seasons. As climate change intensifies the frequency and severity of drought events, this knowledge is critical for anticipating shifts in tree growth and resilience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.