Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40364561›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of surgery2025

The initial experience of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Zi Qin Ng, Naradha Lokuhetty, Chloe Macdonald, Satish Warrier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zi Qin NgDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6272-4640
Naradha LokuhettyDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7565-8956
Chloe MacdonaldDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1843-2309
Satish WarrierDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, The Alfred, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0146-1485

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSE) is an extension of minimally invasive colorectal surgery. NOSE was introduced into the unit in January 2024 in selected group of patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the initial experience of NOSE surgery in minimally invasive surgery colorectal surgery in terms of feasibility and safety outcomes. Prospective data was collated for all cases of NOSE in colorectal surgery from Jan 2024 to Dec 2024. Data collected included patient demographics, comorbidities, underlying pathology, pre-, intra- and post-operative outcomes. There were 17 cases considered for NOSE surgery. Eight cases had successful transvaginal NOSE and six cases had successful transanal NOSE. The median age was 68.5 years (range 36-87 years). The median ASA was 3 (range 1-4). All the transvaginal NOSE were performed with laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for neoplasia. Of the six transanal NOSE, four were performed for benign and two for malignant indications. There were no intraoperative complications with no conversion to open surgery. There were no post-operative complications especially anastomotic leak, ileus, wound infection, and extraction-site related complications in transvaginal NOSE cases. There was one anastomotic leak in transanal NOSE that required laparoscopic washout and defunctioning ileostomy. All the neoplasia cases achieved satisfactory oncological outcomes (R0 resection & adequate lymph node yield). The median follow-up was 6 months (range 2-11). The early experience of NOSE in colorectal surgery is safe and feasible in well selected group of patients. It avoids abdominal wall trauma from extraction with reduction of wound infection, pain and long-term risk of incisional hernia.

Indexed as

ColectomyMISmorbidityNOSEoutcomes 31

Identifiers

PMID40364561
PMCPMC12124337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.