ArticleDevelopment, growth & differentiation2025
Measuring intraventricular pressure in developing mouse embryos: Uncovering a repetitive mechanical cue for brain development.
Article in Development, growth & differentiation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanical impact on neural stem cell lineage decisions in human brain organoids.EMBO reports · 2026Article
- Neuromechanobiology: Bridging Mechanobiology and Neuroscience Through Evidence and Open Questions.Cells · 2026Review
- Measuring intraventricular pressure in developing mouse embryos: Uncovering a repetitive mechanical cue for brain development.Development, growth & differentiation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In living organisms, including humans, the developmental processes that construct their morphology from a single fertilized egg are influenced not only by genetic regulation but also by various external factors. One such factor is mechanical stimulation. Although mechanical forces are suggested to contribute to brain formation during development, quantitative information on intraventricular pressure during neurogenesis remains limited. We developed a high time-resolution system efficiently using a piezoresistive sensor to measure brain intraventricular pressure in mouse embryos from E12.5 to E16.5 (embryonic stages in days). Ex utero measurements revealed intraventricular pressure increasing from 53.76 ± 4.16 Pa at E12.5 to 158.10 ± 19.94 Pa by E16.5. In utero analyses uncovered striking periodicity in sync with uterine contractions, reaching up to 1430 ± 195.2 Pa at E12.5, indicating dynamic mechanical stimuli beyond ex utero observations. Additionally, perforation experiments at E9.0-E15.5 showed rapid neuroepithelial thickening and apical surface contraction upon pressure release, indicative of a tensile effect by the positive intraventricular pressure. This effect diminished after E15.5, implying that tension wanes or the neuroepithelium becomes more robust. These results highlight the dynamic nature of embryonic intraventricular pressure, governed by internal fluid production and uterine forces, and emphasize the importance of mechanical cues in neuroepithelial architecture. Our findings provide a steppingstone to clarify how mechanical forces integrate with genetic and molecular processes to shape normal brain development and may render new perspectives on brain evolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.