Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40364551›Full record

ArticleDisasters2025

Humanitarian management of drought needs better water security data.

William A Veness, Nancy Balfour, Jimmy O'Keeffe, Wouter Buytaert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disasters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

William A VenessDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Grantham Institute - Climate Change and the Environment, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8715-9561
Nancy BalfourCentre for Humanitarian Change, Kenya.
Jimmy O'KeeffeSchool of History and Geography, Dublin City University, Ireland.
Wouter BuytaertDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Grantham Institute - Climate Change and the Environment, Imperial College London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Natural Environment Research Council NE/S007415/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Droughts are a primary driver of humanitarian crises in arid regions, yet early warning systems that index humanitarian financing often omit water security data in favour of food security monitoring. Based on 42 expert interviews assessing management barriers and information needs during the 2020-24 drought in the Horn of Africa, resulting in an estimated 71,100 excess deaths in Somalia alone, we find water security data to be critical in shifting management to proactive mechanisms. Monitoring of water availability (such as water quality and groundwater/surface water levels) and water access (such as water prices and household surveys) is needed to design solutions that proactively mitigate water shortages and their secondary impacts on food security (such as through borehole rehabilitation, alternative water supplies, and cash transfers). Furthermore, if causal relations between water and food insecurity are analysed, the cost-benefit basis for financing water supply interventions can be more completely propositioned, and food insecurity hotspots can be better anticipated.

Indexed as

AltruismDroughtsRelief WorkWater SupplyFood SecurityFood SupplyHumansSomaliaWater Qualityanticipatory actiondisaster risk reductiondroughtearly warning systemsfood securityHorn of Africawater security

Identifiers

PMID40364551
PMCPMC12075996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.