ArticleJournal of radiation research2025
Optimizing dwell time weight for interstitial needles in intracavitary/interstitial hybrid brachytherapy: balancing tumor coverage with organ sparing using the inverse planning technique.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of the locking function of hybrid inverse planning optimization on the treatment plan quality of intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recommended dwell time weight of the needle in intracavitary/interstitial hybrid brachytherapy (HBT) has been 10-20%. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between the weight constraint of the needle and normal organ doses in uterine cervical cancer HBT. This study included 30 cervical cancer patients who received HBT with tandem/ovoid applicators. In our clinical practice, treatment plans were generated without the constraint of the dwell time weight of the needle. The cases where this weight exceeded 20% were replanned. An inverse planning technique with locking downscaled needle dwell time was used to reproduce isodose lines of clinical plans. Replanning repeated with downscaling of the dwell time until the weight of the needle fell <20% (Needle-Lock plan). The Needle-Lock plans were rescaled to coincide with the high-risk clinical target volumes D90 of clinical plans. D2cc in normal organs and the overdose area >200% of the prescribed dose were evaluated. In 17 of 30 (56.7%) clinical plans, the weight of the needle exceeded 20%. The rectum, bladder and sigmoid colon D2cc significantly increased with the Needle-Lock plan. The overdosage area also increased significantly (P < 0.01). The correlations between the needle number and the increase of D2cc in the rectum and sigmoid colon (P < 0.01) were statistically significant. Limiting needle dwell time weight by 10-20% increased bladder and rectum doses, especially with multiple needles. These findings suggest that needle dwell time weight recommendations could need to be reconsidered based on individual and institutional situation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.