ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025
Evaluation of internal target volume of abdominal tumors using cine-MRI.
Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of internal target volume of abdominal tumors using cine-MRI.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe detailed anatomy visualization with magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy is particularly attractive for abdominal treatments, but patient respiratory motion can compromise image quality. The "navigator technique" produces high-quality 3D images, triggered by diaphragm displacement, in exhale phase only. The gold standard for planning is 4D imaging, which visualizes the lesion for all breathing phases. When 4D imaging is not available, an alternative is using 3D imaging combined with motion information from cine-MR.
methodsThis work investigates two alternative internal target volume (ITV) generation methods and compares them with the original treatment 4DCT imaging ITV. Datasets were analyzed from 10 upper abdominal patients that originally had been treated with a 4DCT-based ITV. In addition to the 4DCT, these patients received an exhale MR and cine-MR scans prior to treatment. An MR-CT-compatible motion phantom was also used to compare the two alternative ITV methods with the clinical 4DCT method. The first ITV method uses "margins expansion" (ME method) asymmetrically. The second method duplicates the exhale gross tumor volume (GTV) and shifts it to the positions of the average inhale GTV and mid-position GTV. The ITV is the "Boolean combine" (BC method) of the three displaced GTVs. The ME and BC methods were compared with the clinical 4DCT method using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) to determine the impact of approximating the true GTV trajectory and neglecting deformation.
resultsThe ITV DSC ranges were 73%-96% for the ME method and 76%96% for the BC method. The BC approach created smaller treatment volumes than the ME method and more closely resembled the 4DCT margin for cases with larger motion and a significant component in the anterior-posterior direction.
conclusionsAn exhale MR combined with cine-MR can be used to simply create an ITV for adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy. For small lesions with larger anterior motion, the Boolean Combine method is the more accurate method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.