Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40364516›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025

Evaluation of internal target volume of abdominal tumors using cine-MRI.

Jessica Lye, Reza Alinaghi-Zadeh, Sandie Fisher, Nikki Shelton, Glenn Cahoon, Leah McDermott, Richard Khor, Kym Rykers, Sweet Ping Ng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Evaluation of internal target volume of abdominal tumors using cine-MRI.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jessica LyeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Reza Alinaghi-ZadehDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Sandie FisherDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Nikki SheltonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Glenn CahoonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Leah McDermottDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Richard KhorDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Kym RykersDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Sweet Ping NgDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton John Cancer Wellness and Research Centre, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe detailed anatomy visualization with magnetic resonance (MR)-guided radiotherapy is particularly attractive for abdominal treatments, but patient respiratory motion can compromise image quality. The "navigator technique" produces high-quality 3D images, triggered by diaphragm displacement, in exhale phase only. The gold standard for planning is 4D imaging, which visualizes the lesion for all breathing phases. When 4D imaging is not available, an alternative is using 3D imaging combined with motion information from cine-MR.

methodsThis work investigates two alternative internal target volume (ITV) generation methods and compares them with the original treatment 4DCT imaging ITV. Datasets were analyzed from 10 upper abdominal patients that originally had been treated with a 4DCT-based ITV. In addition to the 4DCT, these patients received an exhale MR and cine-MR scans prior to treatment. An MR-CT-compatible motion phantom was also used to compare the two alternative ITV methods with the clinical 4DCT method. The first ITV method uses "margins expansion" (ME method) asymmetrically. The second method duplicates the exhale gross tumor volume (GTV) and shifts it to the positions of the average inhale GTV and mid-position GTV. The ITV is the "Boolean combine" (BC method) of the three displaced GTVs. The ME and BC methods were compared with the clinical 4DCT method using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) to determine the impact of approximating the true GTV trajectory and neglecting deformation.

resultsThe ITV DSC ranges were 73%-96% for the ME method and 76%96% for the BC method. The BC approach created smaller treatment volumes than the ME method and more closely resembled the 4DCT margin for cases with larger motion and a significant component in the anterior-posterior direction.

conclusionsAn exhale MR combined with cine-MR can be used to simply create an ITV for adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy. For small lesions with larger anterior motion, the Boolean Combine method is the more accurate method.

Indexed as

Abdominal NeoplasmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CinePhantoms, ImagingRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedFour-Dimensional Computed TomographyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingOrgans at RiskRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedTumor Burdencine‐MRIITVmotionMR‐Linac.

Identifiers

PMID40364516
PMCPMC12148771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.