ArticleKorean journal of orthodontics2025
Remineralization of eroded enamel for improved orthodontic bracket bonding: An
Article in Korean journal of orthodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of two biomimetic remineralizing systems on artificially demineralized enamel: Assessment of mineral recovery and orthodontic bracket bond strength.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Nanoparticle-Enriched Sodium Fluoride Gel with and Without Er, Cr: YSGG Laser Activation: Effects on Enamel Microhardness and Sealant Bond Performance on Demineralized Enamel.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Effects of contemporary remineralization agents on the repair and regeneration of eroded enamel, specifically examining Vickers hardness (VH), shear bond strength (SBS), the calcium/phosphorus (Ca/P) ratio, and bracket-enamel interface. Methods: Extracted maxillary premolars with intact enamel were selected. Sixteen samples with sound uneroded enamel (Group 1, control) and eighty artificially eroded samples were used. The eroded samples (n = 80) were etched with phosphoric acid and divided into five remineralization treatment groups (Groups 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6) based on the type of remineralization applied. VH and Ca/P ratios were assessed using energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. All samples were primed and bonded with orthodontic brackets. Two samples from each group were assessed under a scanning electron microscope to analyze the bracket-enamel interface. The remaining samples underwent SBS testing. The debonded surfaces were evaluated using the adhesive remnant index. Statistical analysis was conducted using ANOVA and post hoc multiple comparison tests ( Results: The lowest SBS was recorded in Group 2, where brackets were bonded to eroded enamel. In contrast, the highest SBS was observed in sound enamel. Group 2 also exhibited the lowest Ca/P ratio, while sound enamel demonstrated the highest mean VH. Notably, eroded enamel treated with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles (HAnp), NR-5 Conclusions: Eroded enamel remineralized with HAnp, NR-5
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.