ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Modern Biomarkers in IgA Nephropathy and Their Potential in Paediatric Research.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sarsasapogenin Preserves Podocyte Integrity and Attenuates Renal Injury in Experimental IgA Nephropathy.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026Article
- Management of IgA nephropathy and the expanding role of immunomodulation.Kidney international supplements · 2026Review
- Multi-Modal, Machine Learning-Driven Framework Integrating Multi-Omics for Personalized Chronic Kidney Disease Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Heterogeneous Renal Trajectories in Pediatric IgA Nephropathy: A Single-Center Experience Highlighting the Dynamic Nature of Early Disease.Pediatric reports · 2026Article
- Urinary IL-18 predicts progression of IgA nephropathy.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- Article
- Patterns of Glomerular Injury: Histopathological Classification and Clinical Correlation.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is one of the most common forms of glomerulonephritis and one of the main causes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), affecting up to 40% of patients after 20 years of the disease. Over the past few years, several studies have been conducted to search for biomarkers that can diagnose IgAN in a non-invasive way, select patients in the asymptomatic phase, assess the progression of the disease process and monitor its efficacy, and assess the risk of IgA nephropathy progression. Non-invasive investigations using molecules as an alternative to renal biopsy have potential relevance for diagnosis, the determination of treatment efficacy and the assessment of disease activity. For the early screening of IgAN with isolated haematuria, these factors may be useful for early intervention and result in a reduction in the risk of impaired renal function. The clinical studies discussed in this review underline that featured molecules show potential as biomarkers for the diagnosis and assessment of disease progress in IgAN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.