ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy and Conduction System Pacing.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative effects of biventricular and right ventricular pacing on clinical outcomes in atrioventricular block: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Left bundle branch block (LBBB), initially described in the early 20th century, has become increasingly recognized as one of the leading causes of advanced heart failure (HF). In addition to rapidly growing data on guideline-directed medical therapy, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) via transvenous coronary sinus lead has been the gold-standard therapy, but one-third of the indicated patients do not receive the expected benefits. Recently, cardiac conduction system pacing (CSP) was identified as an alternative to traditional CRT strategy, and multiple data have been published during the last few years. This review will discuss the diagnostic criteria of LBBB and its relation to the development of HF and review available data for traditional CRT as well as CSP in depth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.