ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Systematic Review of the Antitumor Activities and Mechanisms of Scorpion Venom on Human Breast Cancer Cells Lines (In Vitro Study).
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Venom-Derived Peptides in Breast Cancer: Pharmacological Mechanisms and Medicinal Chemistry-Guided Translational Development.Archiv der Pharmazie · 2026Review
- Evaluation of the Cytotoxic Effects ofJournal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2026Article
- Scorpion venom as a molecular treasure: emerging bioactive compounds and translational therapeutic insights.Archives of toxicology · 2026Review
- Anticancer natural products from the Middle East and North Africa: biodiversity, mechanisms, and translational challenges.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Scorpion Venom as a Source of Cancer Drugs: A Comprehensive Proteomic Analysis and Therapeutic Potential.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- A novel scorpine-like peptide from the amazonian scorpionFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.