ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Phenotypes of Exacerbations in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transitions to and reversion from a persistent frequent-exacerbator state in COPD.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Cluster Analysis of Healthcare Utilization Patterns in Patients with Comorbid Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Atrial Fibrillation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Efficacy and mechanisms of andrographolide derivative in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis, network pharmacology, molecular docking, andFrontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Latent Class Analysis to Identify Novel Phenotypes in Exacerbations of COPD: A Retrospective, Multicenter Cohort Study.MedComm · 2025Article
- From Precision Therapies to Imprecise Patient Selection: Are We Ready for Biologics in COPD?Open respiratory archivesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic respiratory disease with an important public health challenge and a major burden on health-care resources, having a progressive character with constant deterioration of lung function. During the course of the disease, patients experience acute episodes of exacerbation, which are characterized by worsening symptoms, and require additional treatment during these exacerbating episodes. Given the heterogeneity of exacerbations, their phenotyping is of great interest in order to administer the most effective treatment with the aim of reducing mortality and preventing future exacerbation episodes. The lack of specific biomarkers for the diagnosis of acute exacerbations of COPD maintains researchers' interest in trying to identify such a biomarker. In this review, we explore the different phenotypes of COPD exacerbation, and we also evaluated the ability of various biomarkers to establish the etiology of exacerbations in association with clinical manifestations. Furthermore, we addressed the main therapeutic measures necessary according to each phenotype. Overall, phenotyping exacerbations allows for an individualized approach to these patients, thus avoiding the side effects of some treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.