Determining the Optimal Cutoff Value for the Reverse Shock Index Multiplied by the Glasgow Coma Scale for the Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality in Pediatric Trauma Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

1. Age-adjusted shock index vs. reverse shock index multiplied by Glasgow Coma Scale to evaluate mortality in pediatric trauma: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.Pediatric surgery international · 2026
   Pooled it
2. Comparison of the revised Shock Index multiplied by the Glasgow Coma Scale and the Trauma and Injury Severity Score for predicting survival in paediatric patients with trauma: a nationwide retrospective cohort study in Japan.BMJ open · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as