ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2025
Imaging of Status Epilepticus.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Crossed cerebellar diaschisis in status epilepticus: A systematic review of the literature.Epileptic disorders : international epilepsy journal with videotape · 2026Pooled it
- Neurosyphilis presenting as status epilepticus and hemiplegia diagnosed by metagenomic next-generation sequencing: A case report.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Article
- Clinical utility of Arterial Spin Labeling perfusion images in pediatric neurological emergencies.La Radiologia medica · 2026Review
- Peri-Ictal MRI Abnormalities and Risk of Unprovoked Seizures After De Novo Status Epilepticus.Neurology · 2026Article
- Article
- Case Report: Epilepsy-related pure word deafness in the elderly: an underreported presentation?Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MRI plays an increasingly important role in the diagnosis of status epilepticus (SE). Approximately half of patients with SE do not have pre-existing epilepsy, and the cause of de novo SE is frequently unknown. The role of MRI in the identification of causes of SE is invaluable. MRI is often helpful as a diagnostic tool in cases of non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) with ambiguous EEG findings. Thus, MRI is recommended for all patients presenting with de novo SE, patients with known epilepsy with the first episode of SE and NCSE with equivocal EEG. Different peri-ictal MRI (PMA) alterations may be seen during ongoing SE or briefly after its cessation. They commonly present as peri-ictal hyper-perfusion, diffusion restriction and/or FLAIR-hyperintensity affecting specific brain areas such as the cortex, hippocampus, pulvinar of the thalamus, splenium of the corpus callosum, claustrum or cerebellum, frequently in combination, suggesting the existence of a "status epilepticus network". MRI sequences, which are necessary for detecting PMA, include diffusion-weighted imaging, fluid attenuated inversion recovery, T1-weighted imaging with and without contrast application, as well as perfusion sequences such as arterial spin labeling. Recent research suggests that they may serve as biomarkers for predicting an outcome in SE. Patients with PMA seem to have a higher mortality rate compared to those without PMA. However, there is still a substantial knowledge gap and there are many open questions related to imaging in SE. Further prospective quantitative MRI studies with uniform protocols, timing and follow-up periods are needed to answer these important and clinically relevant questions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.