Magnetic Solid-Phase Extraction Based on C18 Nanoparticles for the Determination of Pesticides in Aquaculture Water Samples.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Metal-organic frameworks for the treatment of endocrine-disrupting chemicals.iScience · 2026
   Review
2. Preparation of superhydrophobic magnetic Fe₃O₄@C16&TMS nanomaterials and their application to the determination of eight volatile methylsiloxanes in water.Mikrochimica acta · 2026
   Article
3. Novel Magnetic Covalent Organic Frameworks Fabricated Through In Situ Synthesis and Assembly for the Efficient Extraction and Enrichment of Six Amide Herbicides.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
   Article
4. Nanoparticle-assisted strategies in mass spectrometry-based metabolite analysis: recent advances across analytical workflow.Mikrochimica acta · 2025
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as