Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40363801›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2025

A Comprehensive Review of Milk Components: Recent Developments on Extraction and Analysis Methods.

Maria Assunta Acquavia, Antonio Villone, Roberto Rubino, Giuliana Bianco

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Synthetic toehold biosensors for detectingFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maria Assunta AcquaviaDipartimento di Scienze di Base e Applicate, Università degli Studi della Basilicata, Via dell'Ateneo Lucano, 10, 85100 Potenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6103-8860
Antonio VilloneDipartimento di Scienze di Base e Applicate, Università degli Studi della Basilicata, Via dell'Ateneo Lucano, 10, 85100 Potenza, Italy.
Roberto RubinoAssociazione Nazionale Formaggi Sotto il Cielo-Anfosc, Via San Leonardo 62/A, 84131 Salerno, Italy.
Giuliana BiancoDipartimento di Scienze di Base e Applicate, Università degli Studi della Basilicata, Via dell'Ateneo Lucano, 10, 85100 Potenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9427-2274

Funding

Regione Basilicata CUP: C37G22000350002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in identifying both the macro- and micro-constituents of milk, as their functional and health benefits have been recognized. This review provides a comprehensive overview of all milk constituents, including fats, proteins, oligosaccharides and polysaccharides, vitamins, minerals and polyphenols, along with their extraction protocols and the analytical methods employed for their separation and detection over the last ten years. The principles, strengths and limitations of these methods are discussed, highlighting their importance in advancing milk research. Traditional methods such as spectrophotometry, and advanced technologies, like mass spectrometry and omics approaches, are described to collectively enable a comprehensive understanding of milk's nutritional and functional components. Election criteria for the analytical platforms suitable for target analytes are provided.

Indexed as

MilkAnimalsChemical FractionationHumansMass SpectrometryMilk ProteinsMineralsOligosaccharidesPolyphenolsPolysaccharidesVitaminsMilk ProteinsMineralsOligosaccharidesPolyphenolsPolysaccharidesVitaminsanalytical methodschromatographymacro–micro constituentsmass spectrometrymilkUV-Vis

Identifiers

PMID40363801
PMCPMC12073687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.