Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40363687›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Implementation of Machine Learning in Flat Die Extrusion of Polymers.

Nickolas D Polychronopoulos, Ioannis Sarris, John Vlachopoulos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nickolas D PolychronopoulosDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of West Attica, Ancient Olive Grove Campus, Egaleo, 12241 Athens, Greece.
Ioannis SarrisDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of West Attica, Ancient Olive Grove Campus, Egaleo, 12241 Athens, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-6542-0490
John VlachopoulosDepartment of Chemical Engineering, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L7, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6256-8230

Funding

European Union 101129698-PROMATAI-Horizon-MSCA-2022-SE-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Achieving a uniform thickness and defect-free production in the flat die extrusion of polymer sheets and films is a major challenge. Dies are designed for one extrusion scenario, for a polymer grade with specified rheological behavior, and for a given throughput rate. The extrusion of different polymer grades and at different flow rates requires trial-and-error procedures. This study investigated the application of machine learning (ML) to provide guidance for the extrusion of sheets and films with a reduced thickness, non-uniformities, and without defects. A dataset of 200 cases was generated using computer simulation software for flat die extrusion. The dataset encompassed variations in die geometry by varying the gap under a restrictor, polymer rheological and thermophysical properties, and processing conditions, including throughput rate and temperatures. The dataset was used to train and evaluate the following three powerful machine learning (ML) algorithms: Random Forest (RF), XGBoost, and Support Vector Regression (SVR). The ML models were trained to predict thickness variations, pressure drops, and the lowest wall shear rate (targets). Using the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis provided valuable insights into the influence of input features, highlighting the critical roles of polymer rheology, throughput rate, and the gap beneath the restrictor in determining targets. This ML-based methodology has the potential to reduce or even eliminate the use of trial and error procedures.

Indexed as

dataset generationML algorithmspolymer rheologySHAP analysis

Identifiers

PMID40363687
PMCPMC12073372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.