ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Identification of the Influence of IPA Rinsing Times on Surface Roughness of SLA-Printed Parts Made of Different Materials.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microengineered bone models: advances and applications of bone-on-a-chip technology.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Comparison of tensile bond strengths of different impression materials used with custom trays fabricated by 3D printing.BMC oral health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the influence of isopropyl alcohol (IPA) washing time on the surface roughness of stereolithography (SLA)-printed parts fabricated using the Formlabs Form 3B+ printer. Three photopolymer resins provided by the manufacturer were evaluated: Gray, Tough 2000, and Rigid 10K. Samples were printed in standardized geometries and post-processed under controlled conditions, with IPA washing times ranging from 6 to 30 min, followed by UV post-curing. The surface roughness parameters (Ra, Rz, Rt, and RSm) were measured using a Taylor Hobson Form Talysurf i-Series profilometer under metrologically controlled conditions. The results revealed a clear correlation between increased IPA exposure time and improved surface finish, though the magnitude and monotonicity of this effect were material dependent. Rigid 10K exhibited the most consistent reduction in roughness with longer washing, while Tough 2000 showed substantial improvement with extended durations but also demonstrated temporary surface degradation at intermediate wash times. Gray resin achieved near-optimal roughness after moderate rinsing, with orientation-dependent differences observed. The findings indicate that the careful optimization of washing duration can significantly enhance the surface quality in SLA prints, potentially eliminating the need for secondary finishing processes. The implications are relevant to both industrial and medical applications where dimensional fidelity and surface smoothness are critical. Recommendations for optimal washing durations are proposed for each material, and directions for further research are outlined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.