ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Flexural Behavior of Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) Slabs with Different Strength Grades.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Review of Mechanical Performance Studies on Composite Concrete Beams and Slabs.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Engineering Cementitious Composites (ECC) has gained significant attention in civil engineering due to its excellent tensile strength, crack width control capability, and remarkable ductility. This study examines the influence of the ECC strength and reinforcement on the flexural behavior of ECC slabs through four-point flexural tests. The results demonstrate that ECC is well suited for flexural applications. During flexural tests, the fibers within the ECC provide a bridging effect, allowing the ECC in the tensile zone to sustain a load while developing a dense network of fine microcracks at failure. This characteristic significantly enhances the crack resistance of ECC slabs. Despite the relatively low flexural capacity of unreinforced ECC slabs, they achieve 59.2% of the capacity of reinforced ECC slabs with a reinforcement ratio of 1.02%, demonstrating the potential for using unreinforced ECC in low-load-bearing applications. Further findings reveal that high-strength ECC (HSECC) not only improves the flexural capacity of unreinforced ECC slabs but also maintains excellent ductility, enabling a better balance between the load-bearing capacity and deformation ability. However, while reinforcement enhances both the flexural capacity and energy absorption, an excessively high reinforcement ratio significantly compromises ductility. Additionally, this study proposes a simplified calculation method for the flexural capacity of ECC slabs based on the axial force and moment equilibrium, providing theoretical support for their design and application. Due to their excellent flexural behavior, ECC slabs exhibit significant potential for use in flexural components such as bridge deck slabs and link slabs in simply supported beam bridges. With continued research and optimization, their application in engineering practice is expected to become more widespread, thereby improving the cracking resistance and durability of concrete structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.