Efficiency of Alternative Reinforcement Methods for Wooden Ceilings and Their Ecological Aspects.

In the case of load increases and the refurbishment of existing buildings, it is often necessary to carry out strengthening measures on existing timber beams. When timber concrete composite (TCC) ceilings cannot be used, it is possible to reinforce the undersides of the beams with structural steel or fiber composites (aramid or carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer). This work investigates how significant effects on the load-bearing and deformation behavior can be achieved with these materials in terms of construction practice. The article is intended to show structural engineers which reinforcement measures lead to which forces, deformations, etc., and how these are utilized. This should form the basis for the planning of reinforcement measures, as it is not clear from the beginning whether AFRP, CFRP, or steel is the most suitable material. For this purpose, a comparative parameter study was carried out under practical conditions and with a variable degree of reinforcement using the corresponding formulas. The internal forces in the timber and reinforcement cross-sections, the deflection behavior, and the failure loads at the strength and design levels were calculated. It was demonstrated that, particularly for steel and carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) reinforcements, significant increases in the ultimate load can be achieved and the often-important deformation behavior can be significantly improved. Especially the steel variant leads to high improvements in deflection and breaking load behavior, with the base material (wood) also being utilized more economically as a result. A comparative ecological study in the form of the global warming potential showed that reinforcement methods are also advantageous from the point of view of sustainability compared to renovations with timber concrete composite slabs or new concrete slabs.