ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Current State of Knowledge Regarding the Treatment of Cranial Bone Defects: An Overview.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic Modulation of Wound Healing Pathways and Postoperative Risk in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Biofunctional response of a synthetic ceramic of 99.9% tricalcium phosphate associated with a heterologous fibrin biopolymer and infrared photobiomodulation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this article, an analysis of the problem of treating bone defects using cranial bone disorders as an example is presented. The study was performed in the context of the development of various implant biomaterials used to fill bone defects. An analysis of the requirements for modern materials is undertaken, indicating the need for their further development. The article focuses particular attention on these biomaterial properties, which have an influence on bioresorbability and promote osteointegration and bone growth. The analysis showed the need for further development of biomaterials, the characteristics of which may be multifunctionality. Multifunctional scaffolds are those that simultaneously fill and stabilize the defect and contribute to the proper process of regeneration and reconstruction of cranial bones. Due to the complex structure of the skull and special protective functions, there is a need to develop innovative implants. Implants with complex geometries can be successfully manufactured using additive technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.