ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Approaches for Fetal Movement Detection with Linear Acceleration and Angular Rate Signals.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Wearable Devices and New Frontiers in Smart Health Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- FHP-ClsNet: a model for fetal head position classification based on intrapartum ultrasound.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Lightweight Deep Learning Approaches on Edge Devices for Fetal Movement Monitoring.Biosensors · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reduced fetal movement (RFM) can indicate that a fetus is at risk, but current monitoring methods provide only a "snapshot in time" of fetal health and require trained clinicians in clinical settings. To improve antenatal care, there is a need for continuous, objective fetal movement monitoring systems. Wearable sensors, like inertial measurement units (IMUs), offer a promising data-driven solution, but distinguishing fetal movements from maternal movements remains challenging. The potential benefits of using linear acceleration and angular rate data for fetal movement detection have not been fully explored. In this study, machine learning models were developed using linear acceleration and angular rate data from twenty-three participants who wore four abdominal IMUs and one chest reference while indicating perceived fetal movements with a handheld button. Random forest (RF), bi-directional long short-term memory (BiLSTM), and convolutional neural network (CNN) models were trained using hand-engineered features, time series data, and time-frequency spectrograms, respectively. The results showed that combining accelerometer and gyroscope data improved detection performance across all models compared to either one alone. CNN consistently outperformed other models but required larger datasets. RF and BiLSTM, while more sensitive to signal noise, offered reasonable performance with smaller datasets and greater interpretability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.