Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40363381›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Approaches for Fetal Movement Detection with Linear Acceleration and Angular Rate Signals.

Lucy Spicher, Carrie Bell, Kathleen H Sienko, Xun Huan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lucy SpicherDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0009-0008-1340-9282
Carrie BellDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6542-9762
Kathleen H SienkoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7967-6788
Xun HuanDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6544-2764

Funding

Acute and Critical Care Engineering (ACCE) Training ProgramT32EB032756 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Rodney C Daniels, Kenn R Oldham · 2023 to 2026
$765k
Michigan Institute for Data and AI in Society (MIDAS) Propelling Original Data Science (PODS) program N/ANational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering of the National Institutes of Health T32EB032756National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship DGE-2241144NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB032756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reduced fetal movement (RFM) can indicate that a fetus is at risk, but current monitoring methods provide only a "snapshot in time" of fetal health and require trained clinicians in clinical settings. To improve antenatal care, there is a need for continuous, objective fetal movement monitoring systems. Wearable sensors, like inertial measurement units (IMUs), offer a promising data-driven solution, but distinguishing fetal movements from maternal movements remains challenging. The potential benefits of using linear acceleration and angular rate data for fetal movement detection have not been fully explored. In this study, machine learning models were developed using linear acceleration and angular rate data from twenty-three participants who wore four abdominal IMUs and one chest reference while indicating perceived fetal movements with a handheld button. Random forest (RF), bi-directional long short-term memory (BiLSTM), and convolutional neural network (CNN) models were trained using hand-engineered features, time series data, and time-frequency spectrograms, respectively. The results showed that combining accelerometer and gyroscope data improved detection performance across all models compared to either one alone. CNN consistently outperformed other models but required larger datasets. RF and BiLSTM, while more sensitive to signal noise, offered reasonable performance with smaller datasets and greater interpretability.

Indexed as

Fetal MonitoringFetal MovementMachine LearningAccelerationAccelerometryAdultFemaleHumansNeural Networks, ComputerPregnancySignal Processing, Computer-AssistedWearable Electronic Devicesbi-directional long short-term memory (BiLSTM)convolutional neural network (CNN)fetal monitoringinertial measurement units (IMUs)random forest (RF)spectrogramtime–frequency analysiswearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID40363381
PMCPMC12074447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.