ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Multimodal MRI Image Fusion for Early Automatic Staging of Endometrial Cancer.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrating artificial intelligence and multi-omics data for precision oncology in endometrial cancer: a narrative review.Functional & integrative genomics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This magnetic resonance imaging multimodal fusion study aims to automate the staging of endometrial cancer using deep learning and to compare the diagnostic performance of deep learning with that of radiologists in the staging of endometrial cancer. This study retrospectively investigated 122 patients with pathologically confirmed early EC from January 1, 2025 to December 31, 2021. Of these patients, 68 were in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IA, and 54 were in FIGO stage IB. Based on the Swin transformer model and its proprietary SW-MSA (shift window multiple self-coherence) module, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images in each of the three planes (sagittal, coronal, and transverse) are cropped, enhanced, and classified, and fusion experiments in the three planes are performed simultaneously. Selecting one plane for the experiment, the accuracy of IA and IB classification was 0.988 in the sagittal, 0.96 in the coronal, and 0.94 in the transverse position, and classification accuracy after the fusion of three planes reached 1. Finally, the automatic classification method based on the Swin transformer has an accuracy of 1, a recall of 1, and a specificity of 1 for early EC classification. In this study, the multimodal fusion approach accurately classified early EC. It was comparable to what a radiologist would perform and simpler and more precise than previous methods that required segmenting followed by staging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.