Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40363353›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Continuous Arabic Sign Language Recognition Models.

Nahlah Algethami, Raghad Farhud, Manal Alghamdi, Huda Almutairi, Maha Sorani, Noura Aleisa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nahlah AlgethamiComputer Science Department, College of Computing and Informatics, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh 11673, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6744-076X
Raghad FarhudComputer Science Department, College of Computing and Informatics, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh 11673, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0002-6609-2537
Manal AlghamdiComputer Science Department, College of Computing and Informatics, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh 11673, Saudi Arabia.
Huda AlmutairiComputer Science Department, College of Computing and Informatics, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh 11673, Saudi Arabia.
Maha SoraniComputer Science Department, College of Computing and Informatics, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh 11673, Saudi Arabia.
Noura AleisaInformation Technology Department, College of Computing and Informatics, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh 11673, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-0310-8899

Funding

Nahlah Algethami &Noura Aleisa Nahlah Algethami &Noura Aleisa
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A significant communication gap persists between the deaf and hearing communities, often leaving deaf individuals isolated and marginalised. This challenge is especially pronounced for Arabic-speaking individuals, given the lack of publicly available Arabic Sign Language datasets and dedicated recognition systems. This study is the first to use the Temporal Convolutional Network (TCN) model for Arabic Sign Language (ArSL) recognition. We created a custom dataset of the 30 most common sentences in ArSL. We improved recognition performance by enhancing a Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) incorporating a Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (BiLSTM) model. Our approach achieved outstanding accuracy results compared to baseline RNN-BiLSTM models. This study contributes to developing recognition systems that could bridge communication barriers for the hearing-impaired community. Through a comparative analysis, we assessed the performance of the TCN and the enhanced RNN architecture in capturing the temporal dependencies and semantic nuances unique to Arabic Sign Language. The models are trained and evaluated using the created dataset of Arabic sign gestures based on recognition accuracy, processing speed, and robustness to variations in signing styles. This research provides insights into the strengths and limitations of TCNs and the enhanced RNN-BiLSTM by investigating their applicability in sign language recognition scenarios. The results indicate that the TCN model achieved an accuracy of 99.5%, while the original RNN-BiLSTM model initially achieved a 96% accuracy but improved to 99% after enhancement. While the accuracy gap between the two models was small, the TCN model demonstrated significant advantages in terms of computational efficiency, requiring fewer resources and achieving faster inference times. These factors make TCNs more practical for real-time sign language recognition applications.

Indexed as

Sign LanguageHumansNeural Networks, ComputerArabic Sign LanguageBiLSTMMediaPipesign language recognitionTCN

Identifiers

PMID40363353
PMCPMC12074496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.