Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40363349›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Decoding Poultry Welfare from Sound-A Machine Learning Framework for Non-Invasive Acoustic Monitoring.

Venkatraman Manikandan, Suresh Neethirajan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Venkatraman ManikandanFaculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.
Suresh NeethirajanFaculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0990-0235

Funding

Canadian Egg Marketing Agency R31245Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council R37456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acoustic monitoring presents a promising, non-invasive modality for assessing animal welfare in precision livestock farming. In poultry, vocalizations encode biologically relevant cues linked to health status, behavioral states, and environmental stress. This study proposes an integrated analytical framework that combines signal-level statistical analysis with machine learning and deep learning classifiers to interpret chicken vocalizations in a welfare assessment context. The framework was evaluated using three complementary datasets encompassing health-related vocalizations, behavioral call types, and stress-induced acoustic responses. The pipeline employs a multistage process comprising high-fidelity signal acquisition, feature extraction (e.g., mel-frequency cepstral coefficients, spectral contrast, zero-crossing rate), and classification using models including Random Forest, HistGradientBoosting, CatBoost, TabNet, and LSTM. Feature importance analysis and statistical tests (e.g.,

Indexed as

AcousticsAnimal WelfareMachine LearningPoultryVocalization, AnimalAnimalsChickensSoundacoustic monitoringanimal welfarebioacousticsinterpretable AImachine learningmfcc featurespoultry vocalizationsprecision farmingstress detectiontime-series models

Identifiers

PMID40363349
PMCPMC12074417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.