ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Novel Gain-Optimized Two-Step Fusion Filtering Method for Ranging-Based Localization Using Predicted Residuals.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A two-stage fusion filtering positioning algorithm based on prediction residuals and gain adaptation is proposed to address the problems of disturbance and modeling errors in the application of distance-based positioning algorithms in wireless sensor networks, as well as inaccurate initial filtering values leading to large estimation errors or even divergence. Firstly, based on parameterization methods, a pseudo linear equation is constructed from the time of arrival (TOA) and multipath delay. The weighted least squares (WLS) method is applied to obtain the initial value of target position resolution, and its performance approaches the Cramér-Rao lower bound (CRLB). Secondly, the exact position of the target is obtained using the reconstructed Gaussian white noise statistics and the Kalman filtering algorithm. The simulation results show that compared with other initial positioning algorithms, the average positioning accuracy of the proposed algorithm is improved by 28.57%, and it has a better filtering performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.