ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Exploring Smartphone-Based Edge AI Inferences Using Real Testbeds.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increasing availability of lightweight pre-trained models and AI execution frameworks is causing edge AI to become ubiquitous. Particularly, deep learning (DL) models are being used in computer vision (CV) for performing object recognition and image classification tasks in various application domains requiring prompt inferences. Regarding edge AI task execution platforms, some approaches show a strong dependency on cloud resources to complement the computing power offered by local nodes. Other approaches distribute workload horizontally, i.e., by harnessing the power of nearby edge nodes. Many of these efforts experiment with real settings comprising SBC (Single-Board Computer)-like edge nodes only, but few of these consider nomadic hardware such as smartphones. Given the huge popularity of smartphones worldwide and the unlimited scenarios where smartphone clusters could be exploited for providing computing power, this paper sheds some light in answering the following question: Is smartphone-based edge AI a competitive approach for real-time CV inferences? To empirically answer this, we use three pre-trained DL models and eight heterogeneous edge nodes including five low/mid-end smartphones and three SBCs, and compare the performance achieved using workloads from three image stream processing scenarios. Experiments were run with the help of a toolset designed for reproducing battery-driven edge computing tests. We compared latency and energy efficiency achieved by using either several smartphone clusters testbeds or SBCs only. Additionally, for battery-driven settings, we include metrics to measure how workload execution impacts smartphone battery levels. As per the computing capability shown in our experiments, we conclude that edge AI based on smartphone clusters can help in providing valuable resources to contribute to the expansion of edge AI in application scenarios requiring real-time performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.