ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Sensitivity-Aware Differential Privacy for Federated Medical Imaging.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Federated continual learning for privacy-preserving chest radiograph classification.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Privacy-preserving federated learning with optimized ensemble weighting and knowledge distillation for COVID-19 detection from non-IID medical imaging data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- DualMask: Federated optimization of privacy-utility-efficiency trilemma via orthogonal gradient perturbation and RL-optimized PSO.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Federated learning (FL) enables collaborative model training across multiple institutions without the sharing of raw patient data, making it particularly suitable for smart healthcare applications. However, recent studies revealed that merely sharing gradients provides a false sense of security, as private information can still be inferred through gradient inversion attacks (GIAs). While differential privacy (DP) provides provable privacy guarantees, traditional DP methods apply uniform protection, leading to excessive protection for low-sensitivity data and insufficient protection for high-sensitivity data, which degrades model performance and increases privacy risks. This paper proposes a new privacy notion, sensitivity-aware differential privacy, to better balance model performance and privacy protection. Our idea is that the sensitivity of each data sample can be objectively measured using real-world attacks. To implement this new notion, we develop the corresponding defense mechanism that adjusts privacy protection levels based on the variation in the privacy leakage risks of gradient inversion attacks. Furthermore, the method extends naturally to multi-attack scenarios. Extensive experiments on real-world medical imaging datasets demonstrate that, under equivalent privacy risk, our method achieves an average performance improvement of 13.5% over state-of-the-art methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.