ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Advanced Feature Extraction for Cervical Cancer Image Classification: Integrating Neural Feature Extraction and AutoInt Models.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multifunctional CMC-Nanographene Oxide Hydrogels Couple Fluorophore-Free Cancer Cell Imaging with Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activity.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Explainable artificial intelligence with pyramid vision transformer model for multi-class malignant cell classification on cytology slides.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for colposcopic and cytological image analysis in early cervical cancer detection.iScience · 2026Review
- Recent advancements in the application of artificial intelligence-based approaches for screening, diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of cervical cancer.Oncology reviews · 2026Review
- Advancements in fusion-based deep representation learning for enhanced cervical precancerous lesion classification using biomedical image analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer remains a significant global public health challenge, affecting over half a million women annually, with a mortality rate of approximately 60%, especially in resource-limited regions. This study presents an advanced methodology for cervical cancer diagnosis through deep learning techniques. Utilizing a publicly available cervical cancer image dataset, the research introduces a novel classification framework that integrates a Neural Feature Extractor (NFE) based on a pre-trained VGG16 architecture and an AutoInt model for automatic feature interaction learning. The extracted features are processed through machine learning classifiers such as KNN, LGBM, Extra Trees, and others for classification tasks. Among these classifiers, KNN achieved the highest accuracy of 99.96%, followed closely by LGBM at 99.92%. This study also assesses the computational complexity of various models, demonstrating that simpler models like LDA exhibit faster prediction times, while more complex models, such as KNN and LGBM, provide higher accuracy. These findings highlight the potential of deep learning frameworks in improving cervical cancer classification accuracy, especially in resource-limited environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.