ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Modeling and Analysis of Mixed Traffic Flow Considering Driver Stochasticity and CAV Connectivity Uncertainty.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As connected and autonomous vehicle (CAV) technologies are rapidly integrated into modern transportation systems, understanding the dynamics of mixed traffic flow involving both human-driven vehicles (HVs) and CAVs is becoming increasingly important, particularly under uncertain conditions. In this paper, we propose a car-following model framework to investigate the combined effects of driver stochasticity and connectivity uncertainties of CAVs on mixed traffic flow. The proposed framework can capture the inherent stochastic variations in human driving behavior by extending the classic intelligent driver model (IDM) with a Langevin-type stochastic differential equation. A car-following model with multi-anticipation control is developed for CAVs, explicitly incorporating sensor noise, communication delays, and dynamic connectivity. Extensive numerical simulations demonstrate that higher CAV penetration leads to more stable traffic flows. Even with certain levels of connectivity uncertainty, CAVs can still effectively stabilize the traffic. However, driver stochasticity has a pronounced impact on traffic stability-greater variability in driver behavior tends to reduce overall stability. Furthermore, sensitivity analyses reveal that in pure CAV environments, sensor noise, communication delays and communication ranges can affect traffic stability and energy consumption. In contrast, in mixed traffic conditions, the inherent instability of HV behavior tends to dominate and diminish the relative influence of CAV connectivity-related uncertainties. These findings underscore the necessity of robust sensor fusion and error compensation strategies to fully realize the potential of CAV technology. In mixed traffic environments, measures should be taken to minimize the adverse effects of HVs on CAV performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.