ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Centralized Measurement Level Fusion of GNSS and Inertial Sensors for Robust Positioning and Navigation.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance Assessment of Smartphone Tightly Coupled PPP/INS Integration with an Adaptive Robust Kalman Filter.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Design of a Sequential Filtering Method Fully Equivalent to the Centralized Filter with Cross-Correlated Noise.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the current era, which is characterized by increasing demand for high-precision location and navigation capabilities, various industries, including those involved in intelligent vehicle systems, logistics, augmented reality, and more, heavily rely on accurate location information to optimize processes and deliver personalized experiences. In this context, the integration of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) and inertial sensor technologies in smartphones has emerged as a critical solution to meet these demands. This research paper presents an algorithm that combines a GNSS with a modified downdate algorithm (MDDA) for satellite selection and integrates inertial navigation systems (INS) in both loosely and tightly coupled configurations. The primary objective was to harness the inherent strengths of these onboard sensors for navigation in challenging environments. These algorithms were meticulously designed to enhance performance and address the limitations encountered in harsh terrain. To evaluate the effectiveness of these proposed systems, vehicular experiments were conducted under diverse GNSS observation conditions. The experimental results clearly illustrate the considerable improvements achieved by the recommended tightly coupled (TC) algorithm when integrated with MDDA, in contrast to the loosely coupled (LC) algorithm. Specifically, the TC algorithm demonstrated a remarkable reduction of over 90% in 2D position root mean square error (RMSE) and a 75% reduction in 3D position RMSE when compared to solutions utilizing the weighting matrix provided by Google with all visible satellites. These findings underscore the substantial advancements in precision resulting from the integration of GNSS and INS technologies, thereby unlocking the full potential of transformative applications in the realm of intelligent vehicle navigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.