ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Potential for Wearable Sensor-Based Field-Deployable Diagnosis and Monitoring of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Holistic Performance Programming for mTBI Recovery in U.S. Military Tactical Athletes: A Narrative Review.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Bionic Sensors for Biometric Acquisition and Monitoring: Challenges and Opportunities.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Studies have shown that wearable commercial off-the-shelf sensors, such as accelerometers, inertial measurement units, and heart monitors, can distinguish between individuals with a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and uninjured controls. However, there is no consensus on which metrics derived from wearable sensors are best to use for objective identification of mTBI symptoms. The primary aim of this scoping review was to map the state of knowledge of wearable sensor-based assessments for mTBI, based on previously published research. Data sources included Web of Science and PubMed. Original peer-reviewed articles were selected if mTBI was clinically diagnosed, an uninjured control cohort was included, and data collection used at least one digital sensor worn on the body. After screening 507 articles, 21 studies were included in the analysis. Overall, the studies identified multiple wearables-derived physiological metrics that differ between individuals with mTBI and uninjured controls. Some metrics associated with static balance, walking tasks, and postural changes to initiate an autonomic nervous system response were shown to support diagnosis of mTBI in retrospective studies with acceptable to outstanding accuracy. Further studies are needed to formulate standard protocols, reproduce results in large heterogeneous cohorts in prospective studies, and develop improved models that can diagnose mTBI with sufficient sensitivity and specificity in targeted populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.