Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40363237›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Performance Evaluation of Fixed-Point Continuous Monitoring Systems: Influence of Averaging Time in Complex Emission Environments.

David Ball, Nathan Eichenlaub, Ali Lashgari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

David BallProject Canary, Denver, CO 80202, USA.
Nathan EichenlaubProject Canary, Denver, CO 80202, USA.
Ali LashgariProject Canary, Denver, CO 80202, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5174-8882

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantifying methane emissions from facilities with complex emissions profiles can present a substantial challenge. Real-world emission scenarios can involve dynamic operational background emissions and temporally overlapping asynchronous emission events with varying rates from multiple sources. Previous studies have involved simpler testing setups, often with synchronous emission sources and constant rates. This work is among the first to assess the performance of continuous monitoring systems (CMSs) under dynamic, overlapping emission scenarios with time-varying baselines. The data were collected as part of a novel single-blind controlled release study, where release sources and emission rates are not disclosed during the testing period. Several error metrics are defined and evaluated across a range of relevant averaging times, demonstrating that despite significant error variance in short-duration estimates, the low bias of the system results in substantially improved emission estimates when aggregated to longer timescales. Over the 4-week duration of this study, 700 kg of methane was released by the testing center, while the estimated quantity shows a final mass of 673 kg, an underestimation by 27 kg (4%). These results demonstrate that advanced CMSs can accurately quantify cumulative site-level emissions in complex scenarios, highlighting their potential for enhanced future emissions monitoring and regulatory applications in the oil and gas sector.

Indexed as

continuous monitoring systemsemissions quantificationfixed-point sensorsleak detection and repairmethane emissionssite-level emissionssource-level emissions

Identifiers

PMID40363237
PMCPMC12074173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.