Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40363193›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Non-Intrusive Monitoring and Detection of Mobility Loss in Older Adults Using Binary Sensors.

Ioan Susnea, Emilia Pecheanu, Adina Cocu, Adrian Istrate, Catalin Anghel, Paul Iacobescu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ioan SusneaDepartment of Computers and Information Technology, University Dunarea de Jos of Galati, 800008 Galati, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-4795-4699
Emilia PecheanuDepartment of Computers and Information Technology, University Dunarea de Jos of Galati, 800008 Galati, Romania.
Adina CocuDepartment of Computers and Information Technology, University Dunarea de Jos of Galati, 800008 Galati, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0935-4713
Adrian IstrateDepartment of Computers and Information Technology, University Dunarea de Jos of Galati, 800008 Galati, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1317-6676
Catalin AnghelDepartment of Computers and Information Technology, University Dunarea de Jos of Galati, 800008 Galati, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1849-3072
Paul IacobescuDepartment of Computers and Information Technology, University Dunarea de Jos of Galati, 800008 Galati, Romania.ORCID 0009-0009-7539-4159

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background and objective: Mobility is crucial for healthy aging, and its loss significantly impacts the quality of life, healthcare costs, and mortality among older adults. Clinical mobility assessment methods, though precise, are resource-intensive and economically impractical, and most of the existing solutions for automatic detection of mobility anomalies are either obtrusive or improper for long time monitoring. This study explores the feasibility of using non-intrusive, low-cost binary sensors for continuous, remote detection of mobility anomalies in older adults, aiming to identify both sudden mobility events and gradual mobility loss. (2) Method: The study utilized publicly available datasets (CASAS Aruba and HH120) containing annotated activity data recorded from binary sensors installed in residential environments. After data preprocessing-including filtering irrelevant sensor events and aggregation into behaviorally meaningful places (BMPs)-a time series forecasting model (Prophet) was used to predict normal mobility patterns. A fuzzy inference module analyzed deviations between observed and predicted sensor data to determine the probability of mobility anomalies. (3) Results: The system effectively identified periods of prolonged inactivity indicative of potential falls or other mobility disruptions. Preliminary evaluation indicated a detection rate of approximately 77-81% for point mobility anomalies, with a false positive rate ranging from 12 to 16%. Additionally, the approach successfully detected simulated gradual declines in mobility (1% per day reduction), evidenced by statistically significant regression trends in activity levels over time. (4) Conclusions: The study argues that non-intrusive binary sensors, combined with lightweight forecasting models and fuzzy inference, may provide a practical and scalable solution for detecting mobility anomalies in older adults. Although performance can be further enhanced through improved data preprocessing, predictive modeling, and anomaly threshold tuning, the proposed system effectively addresses key limitations of existing mobility assessment approaches.

Indexed as

Mobility LimitationMonitoring, AmbulatoryAgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsFemaleFuzzy LogicHumansMaleMonitoring, Physiologicanomaly detectionbehaviorally meaningful placesbinary sensorsmobility losstime series forecasting

Identifiers

PMID40363193
PMCPMC12074400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.