ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2025
On-Road Evaluation of an Unobtrusive In-Vehicle Pressure-Based Driver Respiration Monitoring System.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Smart Steering Wheel Prototype for In-Vehicle Vital Sign Monitoring.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In-vehicle physiological sensing is emerging as a vital approach to enhancing driver monitoring and overall automotive safety. This pilot study explores the feasibility of a pressure-based system, repurposing commonplace occupant classification electronics to capture respiration signals during real-world driving. Data were collected from a driver-seat-embedded, fluid-filled pressure bladder sensor during normal on-road driving. The sensor output was processed using simple filtering techniques to isolate low-amplitude respiratory signals from substantial background noise and motion artifacts. The experimental results indicate that the system reliably detects the respiration rate despite the dynamic environment, achieving a mean absolute error of 1.5 breaths per minute with a standard deviation of 1.87 breaths per minute (9.2% of the mean true respiration rate), thereby bridging the gap between controlled laboratory tests and real-world automotive deployment. These findings support the potential integration of unobtrusive physiological monitoring into driver state monitoring systems, which can aid in the early detection of fatigue and impairment, enhance post-crash triage through timely vital sign transmission, and extend to monitoring other vehicle occupants. This study contributes to the development of robust and cost-effective in-cabin sensor systems that have the potential to improve road safety and health monitoring in automotive settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.